Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lett Appl Microbiol ; 76(11)2023 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37942558

RESUMO

This study compared the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of Escherichia coli detected from single samples vs. pooled samples at herd level. The national monitoring dataset included isolates from one sample per pig holding, whereas the research study included isolates from pooled samples of 10 pigs per holding. In both datasets, caecal samples were collected from healthy pigs randomly selected at slaughterhouses and plated on non-selective and antibiotic selective media. Resistance against a panel of nine antibiotics was compared between datasets by generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMMs) and by bootstrapped generalized linear model (GLM) to account for pooling. The highest proportion of resistant E. coli was observed against tetracycline and ampicillin in both datasets. In non-selective media, single and pooled samples showed similar results, but the bootstrapped GLM detected significantly lower resistance to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid in the national dataset. In selective media, a significantly greater proportion of resistant isolates was observed in the research dataset for ceftazidime (OR: 0.05, 95%CI = 0.01-0.42) and nalidixic acid (OR: 0.15, 95%CI = 0.05-0.51). The results suggest that one sample per holding provides similar information on AMR at herd level as pooled samples for most of the tested antibiotics, although less resistance to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, and nalidixic acid was detected.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Escherichia coli , Suínos , Animais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Ácido Nalidíxico , Ceftazidima , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Ciprofloxacina , Reino Unido
2.
Environ Int ; 171: 107707, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36566718

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Human, animal, and environmental health are increasingly threatened by the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance. Inappropriate use of antibiotic treatments commonly contributes to this threat, but it is also becoming apparent that multiple, interconnected environmental factors can play a significant role. Thus, a One Health approach is required for a comprehensive understanding of the environmental dimensions of antibiotic resistance and inform science-based decisions and actions. The broad and multidisciplinary nature of the problem poses several open questions drawing upon a wide heterogeneous range of studies. OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to collect and catalogue the evidence of the potential effects of environmental factors on the abundance or detection of antibiotic resistance determinants in the outdoor environment, i.e., antibiotic resistant bacteria and mobile genetic elements carrying antibiotic resistance genes, and the effect on those caused by local environmental conditions of either natural or anthropogenic origin. METHODS: Here, we describe the protocol for a systematic evidence map to address this, which will be performed in adherence to best practice guidelines. We will search the literature from 1990 to present, using the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection as well as the grey literature. We shall include full-text, scientific articles published in English. Reviewers will work in pairs to screen title, abstract and keywords first and then full-text documents. Data extraction will adhere to a code book purposely designed. Risk of bias assessment will not be conducted as part of this SEM. We will combine tables, graphs, and other suitable visualisation techniques to compile a database i) of studies investigating the factors associated with the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in the environment and ii) map the distribution, network, cross-disciplinarity, impact and trends in the literature.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Bactérias , Animais , Humanos , Prevalência , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos/genética , Bactérias/genética , Viés , Antibacterianos/farmacologia
3.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 101(2): 456-458, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31190684

RESUMO

Although sera are most commonly used in serological diagnostic tests for dengue, sometimes only plasma containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) may be available. When we studied the performance of a widely used noncommercial dengue ELISA in the detection of reactive IgG in sera and plasma from the same individuals, we found no significant differences in the diagnostic performance of the assay. The inter-specimen coefficient of variation (CV) of the optical density was 0.081 and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was 0.92, showing a very strong agreement between the two matrix specimens. The intra-specimen CV and CCC were higher for plasma than for serum at low dilutions, but similar at high dilutions. Overall, our results show that the performance of a widely used in-house ELISA using plasma containing EDTA is equivalent to serum with the recommendation to assay the plasma specimens in duplicate to reduce variability of results at lower dilutions.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Dengue/diagnóstico , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Plasma/imunologia , Soro/imunologia , Vírus da Dengue , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA